But when you think about it, the person who qualifies for the 30% discount is actually, in a way, getting screwed,
Think of it this way
- Someone that drives normally, to work and back, has a social life and takes some 'pleasure drives' can drive about 20,000 km
per year. This person might have a premium of $1,500 which on a pay per use basis is about 7.5 cents per km
for insurance.
- Someone that drives very little (the retired weekend driver), might drive 3,000 km per year. If this person qualifies for the 30% discount they will pay $1,050 per year which n a pay per use basis is about 35 cents per km for insurance.
So, the normal risk (average) driver pays 7.5c/km while the low risk driver pays 35c/km.
The supposed low risk driver pay 467% more for car insurance
on a pay per use basis than does the regular driver.
So, what kind of a discount is that?
Maybe we should have a standard pay per use model based on the distance you drive.
Maybe a standard 8 cents per kilometer.
That would make sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment